File: Screenshot_20201110_122321.png (324 KB, 1920x1080)

324 KB PNG

>>78654807
>NOTREPACKED

I wonder why Mental Outlaw didn't use that one in his latest build video.

so what's gonna be in windows xp /g/ edition

do you guys need a logo

>>78655011
We has anons making logos in the first few threads. Go back to those if you want to see them.

>>78654933
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aWUEnP-t34&feature=youtu.be&t=142

>>78654807
Cortana should have had some cool animation like this one

>>78655059
If they brought Clippy back, that'd be even better.

Did you guys port Paint to Linux yet

>>78655094
Porting an ancient Windows program to Linux is like porting an assembly program from ARM to amd64. It'd be easier to rewrite from the beginning.

File: file.png (84 KB, 664x910)

84 KB PNG

Made progress fixing up systime.c, big thanks to the anon who worked on it last.

Pretty sure this is as close as I can get with the code itself, added some things and squashed a few small bugs, now just need to fix constants/segments/etc.

Also still hoping someone can try out the 90% match exinit.c I posted last thread too: >>78650955

>>78651914
What did you change to get rid of not valid app error?

>>78654807
>magnet
do you guys just download it on your internet or do some proxy magic?

>>78655717
just download

When will the first GNU/WindowsNT distros be avalible?

>>78655604
He showed change on screenshot

>>78655717
Torrent clients uses magnet links

File: proof for NOTREPACKED fgts.png (547 KB, 1960x2168)

547 KB PNG

>>78655717
Use a VPN, or prepare to get your IP address harvested by bioluminescent alphabet agencies.

Also, don't be a technologically incompetent moron like the members of the NOTREPACKED cult. Speak the truth, don't lie and don't spread misinformation based on hearsay.

anonfiles()com/b1F6mbc4p3/Microsoft_leaked_source_code_archive_2020-10-04_torrent

>>78656056
Never idiot.

>>78655094
Why we have to do that? If you are a stupid linux fun boy did it yourself and don't bother us with fucking stupid question. We are working on other complex stuff.

>>78655407
So is missing is the last function. As said in the other thread if you have time eventually have it implemented can help compatibility. (Can we have the skip of keys/validation done in the other part of the codebase)?

>>78656465
Fuck you I'll do it myself then,
WindowsNT from scratch.
Fucking glowie.

>>78656536
>At least you do something. Fuck you stupid linux funboy that think that is the solution to the world problem and no one have to said a word about it. People like that is the worst people the world can have, not able to listen to criticism.

>>78656549
>criticism
>Never idiot.
where?

>>78656536
I'm with you! Lets do it together!
Give me some contact.

>>78656576
cimekec303@idcbill.com
Throw away, message me and I'll send a perminant contact.

>>78656603
>GNU/WindowsNT
Mail sent

>>78656536
But how? NT is not posix and I don't think it is possible to replace the cmd with something like bash without breaking anything

>>78656651
That's the fun part, breaking everything.

>>78656628
Well the mails not coming though so I'll dox my trannycord.
Qz#4293

>>78656712
Create something temporary on protonmail ;)

>>78656729
gnunt@hitler.rocks

>>78656770
Check spam

>>78656404
The glowie torrent is only useful for the Windows 2000 leak. nt5src.7z from NOTREPACKED is better, though.

>>78654933
Fuck off with the ecelebs.

The winlogon anon needs to post on the hidden git.

What's the matrix channel, anons?

>>78657020
Fuck off, chatfag.

File: file.png (86 KB, 724x907)

86 KB PNG

>>78656502
Getting there

>>78656404

>>78656830
>NOTREPACKED is better
What do you mean better? Why only 2000?

What's the difference between repacked and not, and why would some anon repack them?

>>78656830
I'm curious. Is it better because it takes up more space and twice as long to extract? Or is there some other magical advantage?

>>78657186
It was repacked to save space and make it more CONVENIENT for people who actually want to read or use the code. NOTREPACKED apes just like to stare at the CAB files, and probably aren't that interested in the code itself.

Nothing has actually been removed from, or changed in, the source code files. But because people on 4chan are mostly technological illiterates, they don't comprehend how compression works. So, according to them, there must be something wrong since the unpacked nt5src.7z is 5-600MB smaller than the beloved NOTREPACKED one.

And they're too stupid to compare the checksums of the extracted files to find out the truth. I really don't understand why they're on this board, because they don't understand the most basic fucking things when it comes to computing.

Lol all the drama between Repack and non repackaged.. when I just have the source extracted but untouched in a .vhd file, and copy that and mount instead of extracting loads

Full list of missing sources - https://pastebin.com/raw/ChBS1ntb

Also some dirs disabled from compilling by leaker thats why we have even more missing files in binaries.arch folder

>>78657772
I already went through these many threads ago, most aren't existent in XP src or 2k3.. Dfrg can be taken straight from XP src.. I even uploaded an unmod XP src.7z weeks ago in one of these threads with all that I could find in the XP src but no one noticed it so thought nevermind

>>78657151
Very impressive!

>>78657151
Good

>>78657151
publish code

>>78655407
glad to see progress

File: jannydis.png (8 KB, 798x72)

8 KB PNG

>>78657020
the absolute state of chatfags

>>78657370
Why would you care to save 600mb of space on such a file, also you tried to share it like it hasn't been modified when it was thats what people don't like you, you fucked the hash system and expect people to check the hash of every individual hash intead of just the one of the main file, you are scum.

>>78658703
Listen retard. I'm under no obligation to choose the file names you prefer. You are scum. Stop spreading lies and shut the fuck up about things you know nothing about.

>>78658931
>I'm under no obligation to choose the file names you prefer
No one said so but the fact that you felt my presence and superiority enough to talk about it is nice, stopped reading after that.

>>78658703
There's a script in the archive torrent (compare_dirs.sh) that can recursively compare directories. Maybe if you weren't low IQ you would actually use it and the issue would be settled.

You do it like this, retard:

compare_dirs.sh EXTRACTED_NOTREPACKED_DIR EXTRACTED_REPACKDIR

See how fucking hard that is? All you have to press is Enter you lazy stupid fuck.

Whatever shady bullshit you're accusing me of has nothing to do with my actual intentions.

>>78658974
>all of this gymnastics for 600mb
are you too poor for a 8gb flashdrive or what?

>>78658703
> Who cares about saving 600mb
Poorfags with shitty internet connection

> you fucked the hash system and expect people to check the hash of every individual hash intead of just the one of the main file
Write a script to compare the hashes of each files instead of talking without proof retard

>>78659001
Explain to me just what is so fantastic about extracting an archive twice instead of once. Go on, I'll wait.

So many retards on here, it's incredible.

>>78659001
It's no use arguing with him, he worships that shitty repack, anons tried talking sense to him but he just ignores those posts, but as soon as someone links the original he's sure to pop back in with schizo "NOTREPACKED CULT!!!" posts to shit up the thread with.

Simple fact is with the original you can easily make a better repack of your own fine, but with his crappy repack you can't get back the original GSP CAB files, so it's obvious which is better to keep around.

>>78659098
based truther

>>78659098
Why did nobody ever made a better repacked version ? It could be quite convenient

>>78659098
Dude, what the fuck are you going to do with the CAB files other than stare at them all day? They're useless. The source code is the actual value in the archive.

There's no metadata of value in the CAB files other than the build number and you can find that in the source code too, so fuck off.

>>78659148
I'm sure you're just NOTREPACKED faggot pretending to be multiple people, agreeing with yourself, as that's how you got this shit started in the first place. That's why you don't want this issue properly analyzed because the reality doesn't agree with your delusions.

You're a liar, and you spread misinformation. You're a truly toxic and worthless individual trying to sabotage the whole leak to stroke your own ego.

Maybe ask Microsoft for a paycheck if you're not receiving one already, because you're doing their job for them you fucking glownigger.

>>78659192
What the fuck are you on about? A better repacked version? You mean one that includes the CAB files? How much better can it get, it's small, it extracts quickly and it has all the source files.

>>78659249
>I'm sure you're just NOTREPACKED faggot pretending to be multiple people
see, thats why you look like a schizo which you probably are, I haven't read these threads for weeks now and I only made 2-3 posts agains the repacked version.

SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU REPACKED FAGGOTS!

>>78659294
>schizo
So far I'm one of the few people in these threads not spreading lies and misinformation. So there's that, you fucking ape.

>>78659192
Yeah a repack with read-only flags removed & a filename I can actually tell people to search for would be useful, maybe someone should look into making one.
Hard bit is getting it hosted long-term though, it's not much but ~2GB can still be pretty hard to keep online.

>>78659249
>There's no metadata of value in the CAB files other than the build number
And you call us liars just because we link a magnet, lol.

You've had tons of anons tell you about CAB metadata, how these files are likely the exact same .CAB files that MS host for governments, etc. If you can't see why people would value that you're slower than I thought.

>>78659320
>tries to make everyone think the repacked version is not modified, going so far as to use the same name as the original file
>calls multiple anons samefag

>not spreading lies and misinformation.
sure, remember to ignore repacked shills

>>78659324
The CAB files are only useful once they've been extracted. How fucking thick-skulled are you?

>>78659341
Maybe that's because the source code files aren't modified. Why don't you check instead of making retarded assumptions? Aren't you at least curious to find out how fucking wrong you are?

>>78659324
The CAB metadata explanations were just trolls making shit up to derail the whole project. Look for yourself. There's no metadata of value in the files.

What this is really about, is some jealous fag who got mad he didn't get attention for leaking XP, and maybe he didn't like the Bill Gates documentaries so he retaliated like a child.

>>78659347
I'm not talking about the source code you fucking dipshit, you're the one who lied about CAB metadata, I'm just correcting that.

SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU REPACKED FAGGOTS!

>>78659421
Yeah, you're gonna have to provide proof that I lied about the metadata. Otherwise you're just making baseless assumptions, just like your stupid assumptions about the whole repacked archive.

How does it feel to be so fucking dumb?

is 32bit xp PAE worth it?

Here we are again, the NOTREPACKED faggot samefagging away, all butthurt that he's not getting adulation for wasting everyone's time and bandwidth.
Let this thread die - it seems to only be a soapbox for this loser pretending his NOTREPACKED is somehow magic because reasons.

You guys bickering are literal trash.

>>78659455
It's completely dependent on how cooperative your drivers are. Some work fine with PAE - some fireball impressively because of some retarded assumption the writer made.

>>78659443
>There's no metadata of value in the CAB files other than the build number and you can find that in the source code too, so fuck off.
Pretty sure whoever said this needs to back it up, sounds like they've looked already, maybe they can show the rest of us.

>>78659249
> What the fuck are you on about?
If what >>78658703 said is true, make a repacked version that hasn't been tampered with and >>78659324

>>78659490
I would show you, but luckily I deleted the CAB files as soon as they were done extracting, because I'm interested in the source code, not fucking archives.

>>78659476
It may not be pleasant, but it's a change from pages and pages of "bump".

>>78659490
Wrong way around mate - you have to prove your magic NOTREPACKED is actually magical, instead of just chanting it over and over hoping some idiot believes you.

>>78659463
>Let this thread die
Nah, people have been fixing parts of the source here, this thread isn't just about your delusions you know.

>>78659476
>bickering
At least it does keep the thread alive

>>78659517
See >>78659512.

>>78659497
Or maybe CHECK first of all if the existing repack has actually been tampered with or not. Isn't that so much easier rather than creating 20 new repacks?

File: 0bf25848cd4cabed5ba789bd6(...).jpg (59 KB, 750x562)

59 KB JPG

>>78659517
>fixing parts of the source here

>>78659512
>>78659536
It's the original, what's there to prove? I heard repack actually originated from it.

>>78659556
In the same thread you're currently in...
>>78655407
>>78657151

>>78659490
well, you can find the build number in 'ntverp.h' in the source tree. that goes for all the NT versions, and 2000.

File: 1565131494083.jpg (110 KB, 623x469)

110 KB JPG

i thought the notrepacked fag had finally found the good taste to die
great way to shit up an already shitty thread guyz

>>78659579
Yes, the repack originates from the 2.9 nt5src.7z. The only difference is that it's extracted. It didn't come from the NOTREPACKED torrent. It came from the original MEGA link.

The NOTREPACKED torrent was uploaded as a reaction to the repack. It's just some fag seething with jealousy because he didn't get noticed by the newspapers for sitting on the XP source code for years and then finally releasing it because he thought people would notice him.

>>78659476
they remind me of warez communities back in the day
the fighting was the same

>>78659622
now imagine there's at least 1 other cunt watching these threads with important source code but won't release it

>>78659702
Yeah, he's laughing his fucking ass off at the apes flinging feces at each other ITT.

>>78659579
I was about to post another update for systime.c before these fags started up, pretty much got it identical to the .obj now.
Don't want my post covered in shit though so I'll wait for these kids to sleep, need to test it out anyway.

SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU REPACKED FAGGOTS!

>>78659595
Was repacked faggot the one who started the shitstorm. Read better before posting worthless crap, imbecile.

>>78659735
>p-plz pay attention to my 700mb bigger torrent that has literally no reason to exist
How about you kill yourself instead, loser?

>>78659782
>gaslight
Nice try, kid.

>>78659702
And now seeing how some stupid likes to repack stuff and claim ownership on it, he will never release anything again.

>78659790
S]HUT THE FUCK UP YOU REPACKED FAGGOT!

>>78659719
meanwhile, he's thinking to himself:

"i'm so cool, no one else has this code and no one ever will, because i want to feel special forever. i'm so awesome. yay me. i'm the best hacker in the whole world."

>>78659790
Go fuck your brain!

>>78659790
>pay attention to my 700mb bigger torrent that has literally no reason to exist
Your's is the one has no reason to exist, except as IP harvesting honeypot.

>>78659804
Claim ownership? Let's get real here. The real owner of the code is Microsoft, and wtf cares how they packaged it. It's irrelevant to /wxp/ as a project and it barely has any archival or historical value.

This thread must die! Too many faggots and morons around!

File: 1288367321063.jpg (49 KB, 450x571)

49 KB JPG

>>78659823
>no denial just hurt feefees
My work here is done.

>>78659734
Yeah most likely best to get the kids down first

>>78659823
Maybe your worthless torrent is the real honeypot, since narcissists often accuse others of the things they themselves are doing.

You have contributed nothing. You've only confused people and made them look for shit that ALREADY EXISTS in the archive torrent, because no one knows what it contains now that you've spread your FUD for months.

In any case, anyone who doesn't use a VPN while downloading any of the torrents is asking for trouble.

>>78659834
>it barely has any archival or historical value.
I wonder who the fuck gave you authority to decide on that.
You still don't understand you have to let people decide wtf do with the original leak, and that's what makes you an annoying ant.

What you do here is a crime!

>>78659897
The uploader of the torrent decides the content of the fucking torrent, why things are included and why they aren't.

I'll shut my mouth just as soon as everyone stops lying and spreading misinformation about the repack.

>>78659890
>You've only confused people and made them look for shit that ALREADY EXISTS in the archive torrent
And you underestimate your own users... Basically you called them brainlets. Yes, that's the mindset.

>>78659933
You're the one who must think people are stupid since you made up so many lies about the repack to market your own non-contribution of a torrent.

>>78659930
>I'll shut my mouth just as soon as everyone stops lying and spreading misinformation about the repack.
God if only this were true

>>78660012
Stop your bullshit lying and we'll see. I don't think you can. You're pathological.

>>78659930
>The uploader of the torrent decides the content of the fucking torrent
Then what is your problem with NOTREPACKED torrent existing? Why you keep bringing the subject each 1 or 2 weeks? You could happily say your repacked archive contains extracted GSP CABs and because that isn't the original leak, but is convenient in certain circustances. Then let people decide if they want convenience over original... But no, you have to throw shit over not-repacked guy each time you come here.

>>78660057
My problem is the lies that surround the NOTREPACKED faggot torrent. No one would've cared about it if it wasn't for the shitstorm of trolling and lies that accompanied it.

>>78659956
>You're the one who must think people are stupid
Nope. I posted already facts over why CABs would help with archival history in case more info about these archives gets leaked... And let people investigate over it if they want.

>>78660072
and what lies were there in this thread which started you up exactly? or are you talking about shit from literally months ago and using that your excuse?

File: agree.png (94 KB, 500x500)

94 KB PNG

>>78660072

>>78660104
None, except someone was making progress with systime.c here, so by happy accident repackfag decided to cause a shitstorm in the thread not even 30 minutes after. Pure coincidence, of course.

>>78655094
KolourPaint
GNOME Paint
Xpaint (doesn't replicate the MS Paint workflow, but it's even better in my experience)
Just using a real image editor

>>78660104
There are people in this thread and many of the other threads claiming that the files have been tampered with. That's inaccurate.

The only reason someone would spread lies like that is if they're stupid and believe the lies, or they're the one making them up.

>>78660094
Do show the critical CAB metadata that we simply just can't do without.

>>78660072
What lies? Has been told to you many times... Even if you pack doesn't touch individual files, the sole action of having it extracted invalidates yours as original. That's all. Now you can play the convenience card if you want, but is up to people decide convenience and a few megs slim, over authenticity.

>>78660142
So... >>78659823.

>>78660123
Thanks.

>>78660142
I never once claimed the smaller archive was the original. There are some articles that say that, but are you really going to blame me for their misconceptions? It's not like I've been parading around handing out interviews like NTDEV.


>authenticity
You say that word as if it actually has anything to do with fucking CAB files.

What you do here is a crime!

>>78660260
shhh don't encourage them like that

>>78660174
Well, your pathological ways in coming each 1 or 2 weeks to attack not-repacked guy, and your insistence in advertising your torrent archive, would make anyone think you have certain fishy intentions over spreading your archive in the net. In any case, I gave you an a tip to end with this crap. Play your convenience card you have, let not-repacked guy play his authenticity card, and let people decide what they want to do. I hope not-repacked guy and his community is watching too. Is annoying to see this crap each 1 or 2 weeks.

Bump

>>78660212
>You say that word as if it actually has anything to do with fucking CAB files.
Yes, authenticity. The original pack is the CAB packed one, as intented and done by MS. Yours, while "convenient" as you put it, isn't because the sole fact you extracted it. Sorry, but that's how things are.

phew, he's finally pissed off

>>78660390
Guys, please, stop throwing fuel to this... Let's stop this, so we can return to systime.c and exinit.c...

>>78660425
I agree systime.c/exinit.c anon needs us

What you do here is a crime!

>>78660288
Maybe I just don't like it when people lie about something I worked very hard to create.

>>78660350
Why do you worship Microsoft's packages? What's so great about them other than Bill Gates' cock in your mouth?

I just don't get why the NOTREPACKED torrent is linked in OP of every other thread. This is a live project, not a museum. You'd think that the people who are actually building this would be happy to skip over an annoying extra step of CAB-file extraction, and get to the fucking point.

Imagine how many fucking hours have been wasted worldwide on extracting those fucking CAB files, just because some envious fag decided to start the NOTREPACKED meme.

>>78660524
Everything is a crime

>>78660288
>literally everybody who doesn't want to download 700mb unnecessarily is repackguy
Imagine living this rent-free.
To think, all you had to do was upload your torrent a week earlier.
But no, you were a special snowflake who had his magic XP CABs, and somehow deserved adulation for the format, not the content.
Utterly pathetic.

>>78660390
spoke too soon
anyway don't forget who broke the throwing fuel pact guys, they've officially ruined this thread
my advice: don't fall for easy bait

>>78660586
>bawwwwwww its not my fault its everyone elses

>>78657151
What utilities do you use to view, make modifications and compare the files?

I am thinking of venturing on what I can find

>>78660524
You still breathing should be considered a crime.

File: 1544086004355.gif (1.27 MB, 360x240)

1.27 MB GIF

>>78660586
Begging this pathetically to be the considered a "cool kid" is why nobody gives a shit about (or actively mocks) your NOTREPACKED, anon.

there's the bait I'm talking about btw

>>78660607
IDA & BinDiff for comparing things mostly, works pretty well except sometimes doesn't catch some tiny 1-byte changes
with .obj files cvdump is really useful for extracting debug info from inside it too, helped a lot with exinit & systime

OP here, I'll link both torrents next thread if I'm the one that posts it. Fucking stop ruining the thread. This thread is for talking about the source code and making it usable, not autisticly screeching about which archive is better. Fuck off.

>>78660704
Many Thanks

>>78660671
It's pretty easy to not take the bait when you're the only one taking it, and you've been totally BTFO into submission. Let it go, faggot. Nobody cares about your NOTREPACKED, and never will, no matter how much you kick and scream about your precious 600MB of magic metadata somehow making you important.

File: BobPage.png (296 KB, 515x510)

296 KB PNG

desperate

anyone figure out how to strip this down to just kernel yet?

you will go to the prison!

>>78660886
If you just want kernel couldn't you use WRK?
I guess there's still some pre-built things used there though... I wonder if anyone has tried working on replacing those with source from here yet.

>>78660550
>Why do you worship Microsoft's packages? What's so great about them...?
Historical purposes dude. Not every day you get a REAL GSP source package leaking you know. This year we had 2 leaks of such type. First NT3.5 pack (which is also packed the same way), and XP/2003 leak. Sure you value convenience, and no one has problems with that. But others value also having the authentic deal. You are no one to decide on that.

>Imagine how many fucking hours have been wasted worldwide on extracting those fucking CAB files
Again, let people decide on that!

> Bill Gates' cock in your mouth?
You keep insisting on insulting others.

Tsk... Tsk. Seriously...

>>78660886
Build the ntos folder, it contains the kernel

>>78660577
>To think, all you had to do was upload your torrent a week earlier.
I admit we failed this one. No one imagined repacked guy would do such thing. We did it in order to ensure the original Anonfiles leak would survive in case someone would need the original leak.

Also... I don't get the insistence in remark we will just "stare in the CABs". As if having the CABs as insurance would magically deny us extract the fucking deal...

>>78660955
>Again, let people decide on that!
People already decided, and dumped your NOTREPACKED in the hole it belongs. You're just sore because you were beaten to the punch, and are trying to get adulation by pretending your torrent is "more authentic" or whatever cope you're vomiting.

You lost kid - own it, and stop starting shit because you're not important.

File: 1579241656419.gif (1.38 MB, 400x225)

1.38 MB GIF

>>78661008
>We

>>78660654
>Begging this pathetically to be the considered a "cool kid"
You are a "bidenbro" by any chance... So far i've seen, they are the only ones using this sort of rhetoric in their /pol posts... Seriously I don't get what has to do this "cool guy" thing with all this...

>>78660955
It's useless to reason with him, once his excuses are out he falls back to schizo stuff, just ignore the fag

>>78661042
The projection is hard. But I'd expect nothing less from a kid who's still chucking tantrums weeks later because nobody gives a shit about him.

File: 1604714311261.jpg (82 KB, 1111x597)

82 KB JPG

>>78661072
Fuck, this was almost word-for-word what I was going to say.

>>78661015
>People already decided, and dumped your NOTREPACKED in the hole it belongs.
If you are so full and confident about it... Then why you brought the subject again?

You truly are pathologically ill. And raises the suspicions about you having fishy reasons for your REPACK, very far from archival purposes.

>>78661042
>plz luv me cos participation medal
Everyone knows who's the Creepy Joe supporter here.

>>78661100
>cant even read his own posts
Look, I know you have tears in your eyes and you've punched your monitor in impotent rage enough times that it has no display anymore, but maybe try using your short-term memory and recall that you wrote >>78660955?

>>78660955
The NT 3.5 source code was packed in 7zip archives, one archive for the PRIVATE folder and another for the PUBLIC one. It didn't come in CAB files like the XP / Win2k3 leak did.

Everyone's free to get whatever version they want, as long as they STFU with their lies. NOTREPACKED fag could've done his thing and I would've said nothing, if he didn't attack first. Same thing goes for his mentally challenged and gullible minions.

Imagine you spend months creating something for the community, and then get dogpiled by seething retards who barely know what's going on or what's being discussed. At the top of it all they're really lacking in IT experience, spouting nonsensical lies that have no foundation in reality. And then everyone agrees that you're the enemy when YOU'RE the fucking person that made the whole thing possible by provoking whatever lurking hoarder who had the source, to release it. It never would've fucking happened without weeks of threads going 24/7 about this very subject.

Look at the fucking dates of the files. This shit has been sitting on people's hard drives for a DECADE. No one cared to release it. They were all too cool for that.

There are probably egotistical hoarders watching this right now, sitting on the full source code for Windows 7 or even 10. But they're not going to release it because they're too cool for that, and they don't give two shits about the community.

I collected everything I had and released the torrent the very moment it was done. I didn't selfishly sit on it like many people would. I realized the source code would die out in time because most people didn't know it existed, or where to look for it. And BitTorrent was the way to preserve it long-term.

>>78661015
Who's this "we" you're fantasizing into existence?

>>78661173 (Me)
Meant for >>78661008.

>>78661122
>Everyone knows who's the Creepy Joe supporter here.
Good to see confirming your worship for him dude.

>>78661146
>Look, I know you have tears in your eyes blah blah blah...
Because you keep bringing the subject over and over?

I see, you don't support not having the last word.

>>78661168
>if he didn't attack first
You live in a fantasy land, dude. Right from the start, you spread rumours that it wasn't complete, it was tampered with, whatever bullshit to try to trick people into downloading your 700MB of extra shit NOTREPACKED.

Surprise surprise, everything you said turned out to be a lie. DARVO is a really bad thing to try with people who have long-term memories.

>>78661213
I think you meant the other guy. I'm repack anon.

>>78661168
>when YOU'RE the fucking person that made the whole thing possible by provoking whatever lurking hoarder who had the source, to release it. It never would've fucking happened without weeks of threads going 24/7 about this very subject.
jesus christ, repackfag is going all out

>>78661223
My mistake, sorry.

itt: niggers arguing with other niggers over some niggerous and irrelevant thing. proceed to blame each other for ruining muh thread afterwards

>>78661031
Lolz, how delicate... You would prefer "he"? This doesn't change the fact I'm personally glad he uploaded the NOTREPACKED package.

>>78661239
If NOTREPACKED loser stopped pretending he was relevant, we might have had a nice 320-post thread with 250 bumpposts.

>>78661247
I'd prefer "I" - it'd be the most coherent, not to mention truthful, you've been in months.

>>78661224
imagine trying to take credit for a leak during the wack0 2020 leaking season lel

>>78661228
No worries. I made the same mistake some threads back when someone was trying to make a joke to cheer me up. I saw two or three words in his post and automatically responded as if it was hostile. Because every other post was.

>>78661297
I hate to say it but I don't think Wack0 is the one who released it. I don't think it was NTDEV either. For all we know, it could've been NOTREPACKED faggot, who's been trying to take back control ever since.

File: accel-whatev.jpg (11 KB, 300x168)

11 KB JPG

>>78661213
Yeah yeah... As expected, your brain can't stand don't having the last word. You can have it if you want. I don't care.

>>78661300
It was the sleep deprivation talking at this end. It's proving hard to get back into "work mode" since lockdown ended.

File: 1574091120318.png (130 KB, 2088x1427)

130 KB PNG

>>78655030
in the first few threads waiting to get a working compile we already had a name and logo.

>>78661366
Stay strong, anon.

>>78661336
>chuck autistic tantrums literally for weeks on end
>n-no u have a personality fault
Top fucking kek.

File: thumb-up-terminator_pablo_M_R.jpg (32 KB, 400x325)

32 KB JPG

>>78661389

File: file.png (828 KB, 1312x741)

828 KB PNG

meanwhile at Langley.

>>78661754
You might as well have stolen that directly from Redmond HQ. Highly accurate.

Of course they'll be here shitting up the threads with nonsense. They have at least multiple people hired just to monitor the /wxp/ threads. I'm sure of it. It's in their blood to do such things, and it's not like they don't have money to spend on BS.

The truth is that they're powerless against the might of BitTorrent, and trolling is now their last resort.

>>78661754
Though "egotistical" is an accurate description of hoarders who don't share with the rest of the community. They just want to feel cool, while putting the files away on some half-dead HDD in a moist attic where bitrot and rust can slowly eat away at the data until no one has it anymore. Now, if they would've only shared it, it would've been preserved.

>>78662076
>They have at least multiple people hired just to monitor the /wxp/ threads. I'm sure of it. It's in their blood to do such things, and it's not like they don't have money to spend on BS.
Not a glowie, but why would they? Couldn't they just ask the gook moot for IP addresses?
Let's be honest here: if you care about privacy and security you probably already use GNU/Linux and the leak is only XP SP1 source code - 20 years of development missing.

>>78662495
I guess they could do that. Maybe they're doing both.

Well, I think much of the XP code lives on in current-gen Windows. They were even bothered by the NT4 and 2000 leaks and have been trying to rid them from the Internet. They clearly care about their IP no matter how old it is. And, I suspect XP is not that far off from Windows 10 under the hood.

>>78662538
>They clearly care about their IP no matter how old it is. And, I suspect XP is not that far off from Windows 10 under the hood.
Okay, this is convincing. So they've been selling basically the same software with some modifications for 20 years.

>>78662595
No one outside of Microsoft knows how much or how little they change the code in-between releases. Judging by how Windows behaves, it feels like it's just one extra layer of duct tape and lipstick for every release. Nothing ever really gets fixed on a deep level, but everything is just one quick hack after another. That's what I'd guess after having used their OS for many releases, believing each time that the next one would be better, like a sucker.

I left Windows when it dawned on me it will never get good. Just more of the same.

If that's what it feels like on the surface just by using it, then there must be some correlation between that experience and the actual code.

>>78659890
It's totally safe to download it without a VPN retard.
t. No DCMA
>>78661198
>you don't support not having
So he DOES support it? Sorry I'm bad with double negatives.

So, what's the problem with notrepacked? I didn't follow the thread

>>78663344
The go back and educate yourself

>>78663344
TL;DR of it is nothing, they're both valid, one's smaller.

>>78663344
Nothing. It's just that some guy shills his poorly-compressed version, and chucks totally autistic tantrums when people say "it's 700MB bigger for no reason, fuck off".

>>78663511
Poorly-compressed because it's the ORIGINAL.
Different anon, had to. Kek

>>78663533
It's 700MB bigger for no reason, fuck off.

>>78663550
Yep, and anyone can choose. I wouldn't have gotten the torrent if I had realized all this originally, but I did, and am no worse off for it.

I haven't been on these threads since the leak, what are some of the stuff you guys have done so far?

>>78663713
It took about a week to figure out how to compile it, then another three to cobble together a barely-working Winlogon. A lot of files still have to be borrowed from XP/Server 2003 - all this because the source code isn't actually complete.

I was worried when I came back that people would have fucked off. The anons actually working on this, you're doing God's work.

>>78663344
Based only on reading this thread as a third party:

notrepacked
>bigger size
>original cabs unextracted
>may or may not have any interesting metadata, but nothing useful
>archival copy for historical purposes or some shit
repacked
>smaller size
>pre-extracted from original cabs
>supposedly unmodified
>comes with a script to check integrity? (Not difficult to check with or without a script but someone would have to download both and vouch for its legitimacy, or do so yourself before deleting the cabs if you wanted.)
>functional copy (i.e. for tinkering)
So you could pick whichever one you feel aligns more with your interests, or even keep both if you wanted to trade hard drive space for time extracting. In addition, do not torrent anything here without a VPN or Tor unless you know what that entails and accept the risk. Muh DMCA letter isn't the only thing to worry about, just the most likely issue that could occur. Anybody in the swarm could see your IP and potentially fuck with you in different ways. I don't personally give a fuck, but I imagine some here would.

>>78663739
So what's the current situation? Can you boot it up and have it work without bluescreening or something?

>>78663750
>supposedly unmodified
Change that to
>verified bit-for-bit unmodified by about a dozen anons

>>78663767
Not without help (yet).

>>78663787
with help you mean pre compiled files, right?

>>78663809
Yes, and some .obj files.

File: 1522017617608.jpg (55 KB, 593x665)

55 KB JPG

>>78663750
>supposedly
Factually.
NOTREPACKEDfag chucked a tantrum that he was beaten to the punch, and so started a rumor that it was modified. Don't support such childish behavior. I wouldn't, even if it meant it inconvenienced me in some way.
But there aren't any inconveniences to downloading the repack, only upsides: it's smaller, extracts faster, and has better inbox tools.

What exactly discussing right now? It seems really retarded and dumb, please stop and get back to work.

>>78664030
fuck you

>>78664030
don't tell us what to do

>>78664030
shut up stupid moron who can't help us

God I'm so tired of seeing Windows XP, NT and 2000. I swear to God, we'll never leave this shit behind in my field. It's all we use as far as embedded operating systems go.

>What's your 1.5 million dollar MRI machine running?
FUCKING WINDOWS 2000 BABY.
>And your cathlabs?
THE SAME

>>78664057
So many glowniggers in this thread. You're really reaching the levels of bullshitting that shouldn't even be possible.
I'm a GNU faggot and even I'm okay with this project.

>>78664030
get back to work, get the fuck out of here

>>78664107
gnu is bullshit, go fuck yourself, get the fuck out of here fucking mediocre creature

random fuck to everyone

>>78661754
Okay, I'm convinced now. Just look at this shit:

>>78664126
>>78664111
>>78664095
>>78664076
>>78664057

Dump

>>78664161
Eat this shit!

>>78664151
wtf fuck you

>>78664473
fuck you too

that's the spirit anons

>>78664615
fuck the spirit, this all is just a big bullshit

>>78664030
KYS faggot.

>>78664107
How asshurt are you that the entire universe drops everything to check out a shitty, incomplete source dump of 20 year old Windows, and doesn't give one single shit about your hobby OS?

>>78663920
Jesus christ let it go, you're both equally bad now faggot.

>>78657151
How goes this?

>>78665344
>p-plz like me im notrepacked fag so im speshul
You don't matter.

>>78665401
Waiting for the kids in the thread to go to bed so their post doesn't get swamped by prior heated debates

>>78665570
yeah than we can start the hard work ahah I those GNU/linux lovers, they so miserable

Bump for Windows Fundamentals for Leagcy PCs source code

>>78661168
Join our telegram group! We archive closed source code. We have AmigaOS source code if your interested.

t.me/milkdude


I would not say 'hoarding' Gatekeeping is an better word as it imply's hiding information that only 1 human can have/see

File: file.png (337 KB, 1874x817)

337 KB PNG

I got a Windows 10 only application running in Windows XP. A world's first?

>>78667669
Woo a channel with a bunch of dead links and unseeded torrents!

>>78668082
That's kinda cool I will admit

>>78660948
we probably need to use WRK in our amd64 builds as well as the minimum of sp1 related dll's / exe's to get the base system up to where it will use a kernel that we have source to - then hopefully update things like ntdll.dll to sp1 level in our source using bindiff - We need to do it this way since we have many missing drivers in our amd64 build and we need those.

I have a 2ndary hard drive in my pc for backing up webms and pictures and shit. Haven't had any issues with it since i installed it but just now I was trying to save something and its...gone.
Under my "recent locations" thing in file explorer, the directory for some folders are there but its not reachable and its listed as CD drive E:\ when its been named HDD2 E:\ since i installed it..what the fuck is even happening?

i have a dream; no, an ambition
i want to see windows xp ported to holyc
the entire thing, including JIT compiling

>>78656651
NT's subsystems pretty much allow you to implement many diverging "userland personalities", including POSIX. Windows is pretty much only one of those subsystems (although I would imagine the boundaries between Windows and NT are rather blurry at this point), and Microsoft had, at one point, in fact, a NT POSIX subsystem (and a OS/2 one as well).
It's possible that some Interix code is included into the leaks (haven't looked at the leaks, but it was dropped in 8.1 so was pretty much still a thing when XP was around), and the concept of a " Windowsless" NT-based system does sound like an interesting prospect in my opinion

>>78655407
Bump for systine.c / exinit.c updated code :-)

>>78668082
Not really (it's pretty easy to do even on vanilla XP), but still pretty based - and far, far beyond the capabilities of the usual type found on /g/.

Fixed copywow64.cmd for postbuilding amd64.
https://pastebin.com/raw/FXUydrCw
It's Requires fully built binaries.x86fre folder to work.

File: Снимок.png (76 KB, 979x916)

76 KB PNG

>>78668315
Screenshot

File: Снимок.png (14 KB, 722x474)

14 KB PNG

Now it's time to make missing_amd64fre.7z

>>78668315
>>78668351
>>78668457
Will there be a source patch 7z for building amd64 when done?

Think it's high time I test amd64 building in the morning

How could I get this to build on a Surface Pro X? (Windows 10 ARM64 with x86 compat layer)

I go to use normal x86 razzle.cmd but it tries to look for arm toolset not the x86

>>78668457
Hmm... I guess there will be problems with this driver in the future. Firewire 2k3 drivers don't seem to be compatible with the way AMD64 works.

After Building x86fre delete inetsrv\iis\svcs\cmp\webdav\davcprox\fhcache_p.c (it's generated by compiler) .Then bcz in amd64fre should not generate errors

>>78668315
excellent!

>>78668457
rename it to not rabotaet

Last fix for copywow64.cmd to remove CPLocation.cmd(Searches for other build machines with binaries.amd64fre)
https://pastebin.com/raw/ViiEY5Ys

Have people nigger-rigged NT6/Vista+ applications to work in XP thanks to this leak? Anyone with hands-on experience testing those?

>>78669117
Nowhere near that, though >>78668082 got Win 10 Notepad running on it if you open your fucking eyes you piece of shit. At least skim the current fucking thread.

>>78669169
Thanks, it's so easy to get lost in what people have/haven't discovered in leak threads.

>>78669176
Np, still better than the shitfest earlier. Completely understandable.

Fixed copytsc.cmd from CPLocation.cmd
https://pastebin.com/raw/aqpMgwRp

File: Снимок.png (42 KB, 979x512)

42 KB PNG

>>78669227
Screenshot

File: XP-Threadripper.png (169 KB, 1920x1080)

169 KB PNG

XP working on Threadripper

>>78669259
Lol, that fucking graph.

So I downloaded the NOTREPACKED and there's win2k and XP? What do I need outta it to begin to compile XP and get rid of these huge fucking .cab files I'm not gonna do anything with?

>>78668258
bump

https://mspoweruser.com/hacker-claims-to-have-grabbed-63-2-gb-of-microsoft-source-code-from-github/

>>78670371
>May 7, 2020 at 23:32 GMT
>6 months ago
Shiggity

>>78670386
I know, but still waiting for that Office source code :D

>>78670402
Fuck yeah. If only, We need Clippy!

>>78667669
HAH
So give us Amiga QNX and Windows 10 Directx code links here! Working links!

https://gofile.io/d/a8iNHZ some missing files for amd64

it's missing 150~ files because i can't find them(server version requires more files than pro and home they missing in AB1PXFRE_EN)

>>78669881
Read the guide.

>>78668082
Are you sure thats the Windows 10 version? The UI is different as there are no tabs separating things.

>>78670911
https://www.top-password.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/wordpad.png

This is how Win10 wordpad looks like.

>>78670957
>https://www.top-password.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/wordpad.png

Yeah, Thats the 10 version.
The wordpad shown in that earlier pic looks like the XP version not the 10 version.

>>78671208
it might come from vista or any newer windows but not from 10

>>78671208
If that's write.exe from C:\Windows, then as far as I remember it just launches Wordpad either from Program Files or system32.

>>78668237
Interesting. but would this implying lost of compatibility with Windows binaries?

Bump

>>78656404
become ungovernable

>>78669259
i hate games, can we just have this shit and do software graphics from now on

>>78668237
This is what I was thinking about.

>>78669259
No cpu limits is what excites me about this leak.

File: 1605170204639.jpg (34 KB, 480x640)

34 KB JPG

>>78654807
help! yotsuba7pverpfs5.onion is dead!

>>78668082
Whoa, do I understand correctly that you downgraded version in the executable? Then we can theoretically remove the check in the Windows code for this

File: file.png (15 KB, 1038x219)

15 KB PNG

>>78668237
I haven't seen any interix stuff in here sadly. from what I've found it looks like interix is based on the posix subsystem code though (which also isn't in here, though ntcue.pub mentions that it should be at base\subsys\posix\)

We do have code for posix subsystem in the NT 4 leak, though that's probably a lot different to what Interix changed it into.

What was that thing yesterday in the american shitposting hours?
Are the bioluminescent melanin-enriched dudes really trying to derail this effort, or was that a raid of macfags, etc.?

File: изображение.png (104 KB, 1312x752)

104 KB PNG

>>78668082
Why you patched write.exe which size is 10kb, it looks like starter for wordpad.exe in C:\Program Files\Windows NT\Accessories\

I also have a different binary file, attach a screenshot. I don't know how this will work.

Plus, I tried to patch Windows, I'm not completely sure, but I think I found a place where the check is performed on it. Line 3400 in the file base\win32\client\process. c

>>78668082
>>78675557
nigga hacked a fucking shortcut lmao

What's the state of x64 winlogon? is x64 "useable?" and when can we expect a missing x64 zip?

>>78675583
Funny, but not far from the truth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Write
Removed in 95 windows, as I understand it, now it just starts wordpad on the system

On the other hand, he managed to patch it, so it maybe will work for other programs as well.

>>78675963
AFAIK our winlogon v3b works fine on SP1 x64, seems the issue with our amd64 build is something related to starting the actual winlogon process, in amd64/ia64 there's Wow64 stuff tied into it that seems to be breaking amd64 atm.

It'd be interesting if we could see whether ia64 is also broken in the same way, but I doubt anyone here has an ia64 cpu to test thing with.

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20201113-00/?p=104447
>The history of the EncodePointer function for obfuscating pointers

Neat, didn't an anon add this into the leak a few weeks ago?
Raymond says it was added in XP but I guess he means SP2 or something

>>78669259
>threadripper 3960x 24core
>gt710
nice.

File: patched-2020-11-13-19-55-23.png (945 KB, 1718x928)

945 KB PNG

>>78668082
>>78675557
Checked this, neither the patched file nor my fix works
Calling for help :)

>>78676708
Check if there's any error flagged in event viewer, maybe has an error code you can look up in the source.

>>78676708
Check this >>78651914 post, that is my change (the greater than NT 5.2 check) after that: 1) build a new KERNEL32.DLL and 2) replace it in the c:\windows\system32 folder of your Windows XP installation. I haven't tried a full build & post-build & install with this patch in place.

>>78675557
my screenshot came from trying to patch Windows 10's calculator (calc.exe), but that launches also a process from within itself it calls a create process function, iirc I saw launch "ms-calculator:" in OllyDbg, which didn't work, or it came from notepad.exe, which had a lot of missing dependencies, so for this PoC I moved to write.exe.
Anyway that is the place to change error_handler4_common into error_handler3. Make sure to zero out the remaining bytes (the ones from _common) - do not remove them, because that would shift the whole file and break things

Hi,
Anons, please how can I contact the OpenXP .onion team? Who are hosting the code and developing documentation? Please post a temp mail.

>>78677676
If you're just looking for the people behind the .onion / git repos a lot of them are in the matrix chat IIRC.
There's not really any "team" focused on this though, people are mostly just working on things individually, some of them post on the onion git, and some of them only post on the thread.

In general the onion seems to lag behind the thread in most things (eg. winlogon/systime/build-env/amd64-related fixes have come from people in this thread, don't think the devs of them can be contacted anywhere else, at least I never saw them post in the chat about it)

If you have something to ask you might just be better off posting it here and hope someone knows the answer.

>>78660260
>chinese Os hoarder
>massive leak
>"crime! crime!"

>>78677174
>>78677174
Calc from Win10 is not native Win32. It's UWP or Metro UI shit.

You need to port the whole UWP subsystem.

systime.c is like 96% identical, only 1 tiny issue making it different.

It seems when we compile to .obj the way functions are ordered mostly matches how they are in the .c file, except that functions get reordered so that they come before functions that call them.

Eg. if we had function A followed by B in the .c file, in the .obj they'd be placed so A comes before B, just like the .c, as you'd expect.
But then if we add a call to B inside A, the compiler will move B so that it comes before A.
Kinda makes sense I guess, even though calls should be able to go in both directions, I guess maybe it helps with optimisation to move them this way.

With systime.obj in the leak though, there's a function that's ordered completely different to this, breaking the "rule" of callee coming before caller.

Only 1 function seems affected by this, ExpSetSystemTime. In the leak this comes almost last in the .obj, but when building our .c it gets moved to come before ExUpdateSystemTimeFromCmos, because ExUpdateSystemTimeFromCmos has a call to it.

If I edit ExUpdateSystemTimeFromCmos to remove the call then ExpSetSystemTime gets placed how I wanted it, but I can't do that as the original systime.obj has the exact same call fine, but somehow in there it doesn't force ExpSetSystemTime to be moved before it.
Unfortunately there's not much info about how VC orders functions on the net it seems. I'm guessing there's a pragma I can use or optimization flag, but haven't found any that helps with this yet.

Maybe this seems like a non-issue, and functionally it probably is, but it's literally just this 1 issue stopping us from creating a full reproduction of the original .obj, so I'd really like to find a solution if I can.

>>78678124
OK! Share it!

>>78676053
WordPad, like all the other built in windows applications, is just a sample program, in this case, to showcase the Rich Text control.

what about winlogon

File: file.png (172 KB, 1376x898)

172 KB PNG

>>78678124
Of course, right after I sperg out about it on here I find the solution right after
Original on left, mine on right, matches nicely now

Actually I thought that we can port Wine/ReactOS schannel.dll/mbedtls.dll to Windows XP for OpenXP. It would be easy rather than moving to OpenSSL. TLS 1.2 can be ported to XP by porting the two dlls.

>>78678552
>TLS 1.2 can be ported to XP by porting the two dlls.
one of the posready 2009 updates actually provide TLS 1.2 support. can't remember which.

>>78677774
I am looking for them because I think its better to have a thread by thread discussion rather than unstructured talk heading towards nowhere. I sometimes lose track where the last conversation was.

>one of the posready 2009 updates actually provide TLS 1.2 support. can't remember which.
KB4019276 is that update.

File: file.png (79 KB, 695x1027)

79 KB PNG

>>78678124
>>78678464
Huh, only just realised the .obj contains line numbers of each of the functions too.
Sorry guys, got to adjust everything so it matches up with this now, each function has to match up exactly before I want to release this.

Jk, but I'm gonna have a play around later to match the function order here, maybe will help fix the extern ordering too.

New thread: >>78678754

>>78678464
Where we can download the last obj?

>>78670890
>Extract source tree to a folder named srv03rtm
Ok, so which of the two folders in the NOTREPACKED contain the source tree I need? the Win 2k or WinXp?

>>78679258
>srv03rtm
>folder called win2k3
truly boggles the mind

>>78679287
I've never compiled shit, I just wanna be able to fuck with it and try and help. So not the XP folder the 2K one?
This is why not to get the NOTREPACKED isn't it?

>>78679359
eh, iirc repack uses the same folder names too, don't quote me on that though as I haven't looked at it since I grabbed the original

>>78679372
Next thread I'm going to fucking get this shit derailed about the repacking again since your being a cunt and not just answering my question.

>>78679393
>This is why not to get the NOTREPACKED isn't it?
>eh, iirc repack uses the same folder names too
I was literally half way writing a reply about the other question I forgot to address too, but now nevermind

>>78679410
Lol. Fine. I don't believe you, no one on 4chan is a faggot enough to write two replies to one post.

>>78679258
win2k, the source code of XPSP1 is incomplete

>>78679432
believe whatever you want, I don't even see how I was even being a cunt to you since I was just answering your NOTREPACKED question anyway

>>78679436
Jesus, thank you. Sorry >>78679410 >>78679372 >>78679287 Just frustrating when I don't know how "srv03rtm" related to the two folders.

>>78679452
I know I have no idea what I'm doing, but I'd like to try you colossal faggot and I'd like to get these huge files I don't need off.

>>78679473
win2k3 = windows 2003
srv03rtm = server 2003 Ready To Market

>>78680270
Ohhhh, fuck, sorry man.

>>78680378
Its okay))